Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Christensen v. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
as 5:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Stephen Randall Christensen, Jr
Defendant:
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jones v. Hoftiezer et al
as 2:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Leroy S Jones
Defendant:
Scott Hoftiezer, Julie Ludwig, Stephen Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christensen v. Crow
as 22-6052
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN RANDALL CHRISTENSEN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW
Jozo Rotim v. Stephen R. Wadsworth et al
as 5:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jozo Rotim
Defendant:
Stephen Randall Wadsworth and Does 1-10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Lankford v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2021cv03743
Plaintiff:
Stephen Randall Lankford
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Christensen v. Bowen et al
as 5:2021cv00782
Petitioner:
Stephen Randall Christensen, Jr
Respondent:
FNU Bowen and Lawton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Kelley et al
as 2:2021cv00851
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Jones
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, L Wilson, Dr William B Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69120
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN RANDALL JOHNSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2018cv03358
Plaintiff:
Manal Jane Aboelata and Stephen Randal Henry
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, KBR, Inc., Halliburton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
