Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Flaherty v. Surface Combustion, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01845
Plaintiff:
Dannielle Flaherty
Defendant:
Surface Combustion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Surface Combustion Inc v. Modern Forge Indiana LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00385
Defendant:
Modern Forge Indiana LLC , MF-Merrillville Properties LLC and First Midwest Bank
Plaintiff:
Surface Combustion Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00140
Defendant:
Afton Pumps, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, Ameron International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ellis
Cross_claimant:
Crane Co. , Ingersoll-Rand Company , The Gorman-Rupp Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Crane Co. , A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davis, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2013cv32308
Plaintiff:
John Edward Davis and Gloria A. Davis
Defendant:
3M Company, A. W. Chesterton Company, Ajax Magnethermic Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Rapid American Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv07760
Plaintiff:
David Lee Scott
Defendant:
Rapid American Corporation, H.B. Fuller Company, Union Carbide Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. FELLOWS et al
as 2:2009cv91427
Defendant:
RAY FELLOWS, RAY FELLOWS, RAY FELLOWS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Fellows v. Reunion
as 1:2009cv10015
Plaintiff:
Ray Fellows and Ray Fellows
Defendant:
Allied Glove Corporation, Anchor Packing Company, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
SURGES et al v. A. C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90189
Plaintiff:
J A SURGES and DEBBIE J WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC., A. C. AND S., INC., A. C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
