Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Syed Raza v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2238
Petitioner:
SYED ALI RAZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Pridmore v. Zain et al
as 1:2023cv01085
Defendant:
Mitsubishi HC Capital Canada, Inc., Syed Ali Zain and Hitachi Capital Canada Co.
Plaintiff:
Devon A. Pridmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Raza et al v. First Enroll, LLC
as 9:2022cv81753
Plaintiff:
Syed Ali Raza and MED GAP, LLC
Defendant:
First Enroll, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Starlight Distribution, Inc. et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 9:2022cv81091
Plaintiff:
Starlight Distribution, Inc., Syed Ali Raza and Iram Hussain Raza
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation doing business as PHH Mortgage Services and US Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
August, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Zachary August, Syed Ali, Julea Seliavaski and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, D. Awad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Ali
as 21-11065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Syed Ali
BLUESTAREXPO, INC. v. Enis et al
as 1:2021cv20875
Defendant:
The Enis Family Family Trust, Soliel Chartered Bank, Syed Ali Abbas and others
Plaintiff:
BLUESTAREXPO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Syed Ali v. Kelly Barton, et al
as 21-10658
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD SMITH, KELLY BARTON, KEVIN SCHNEIDER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYED ALI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
