Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sabo v. FBG Enterprises Opco, LLC
as 1:2026cv05748
Plaintiff:
Robert Sabo
Defendant:
FBG Enterprises Opco, LLC doing business as Fanatics Betting & Gaming
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Harless v. McBride et al
as 7:2026cv00504
Plaintiff:
Larry Gene Harless, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. McBride, Lt. Sabo, Lt. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2026cv11971
Defendant:
Theresa Foss, Natalie Brookins, Karinah Riggins and others
Plaintiff:
Dequaun Lynn Hall
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Waisel et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04363
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Waisel, Dustin Humphrey, Crystal Madrigal and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McFerren v. Killgore et al
as 7:2026cv00389
Plaintiff:
Latorian McFerren
Defendant:
Major Killgore, Captain Elliot, Lt. Sabo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamm v. Killgore et al
as 7:2026cv00364
Plaintiff:
Mikel Nathaniel Hamm
Defendant:
Major Killgore, Captain Elliot, LT. Sabo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamm v. Sabo et al
as 7:2026cv00334
Plaintiff:
Mikel Nathaniel Hamm
Defendant:
LT. Sabo and LT. McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Williams et al
as 7:2026cv00151
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Hayes
Defendant:
C/O Williams, Lt. Sabo, C/O Bently and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mondesir, Sr v. California Superior Court, et al.
as 26-667
Plaintiff:
EDWIGE MONDESIR, SR
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT and COUNTY OF VENTURA, through its Presiding Judge Anthony J. Sabo and Court Executive Officer
NAZARENE v. DEHMER et al
as 1:2025cv17770
Plaintiff:
GAIL NAZARENE
Defendant:
KEVIN DEHMER, ROBERT W. BENDER, MICHAEL CARUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
