Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robert Lindblad v. Carlos Bolanos, et al
as 22-16200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL LINDBLAD
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLOS G. BOLANOS, Chief, ANDREW CONSTENTINO, Officer, JIMMY CHUNG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00541
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Germani et al v. Safeway Grocery et al
as 3:2017cv06238
Plaintiff:
Kristian M. Germani and Donald T. Collier
Defendant:
Safeway Grocery, Brenda, Jagob and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Germani et al v. Safeway Grocery et al
as 3:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
Kristian M. Germani and Donald T. Collier
Defendant:
Safeway Grocery, Brenda, Sedgwick Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grimes v. Safeway Grocery Store et al
as 4:2013mc80227
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Safeway Grocery Store, Patrick Standard, Kaitlyn Shepardson and others
Ireland v. Sterns Bank et al
as 2:2013cv01784
Plaintiff:
Warren Arthur Ireland
Defendant:
Sterns Bank, Arizona, State of, Phoenix, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Safeway Grocery Store
as 3:2013cv02527
Plaintiff:
Jerome L. Grimes
Defendant:
Safeway Grocery Store
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Safeway Grocery et al
as 3:2009cv02026
Plaintiff:
Cardell V. Mathis
Defendant:
Safeway Grocery, Monument Security, San Leandro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luellen et al v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2008cv05472
Plaintiff:
Cecil Luellen
Defendant:
Brian K Jenkins, John Wilkey, Bradley Graham and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BELL v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2007cv01971
Plaintiff:
KAREEMAH YASMINA BELL
Defendant:
PAMELA SCOTT, SECURITY PROTESTIVE SERVICES, INC and SAFEWAY GROCERY STORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
