Cases 1 - 10 of 42
United States v. Saheed Dairo
as 24-1761
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Saheed B. Dairo, also known as Olawole B. Ibukun, also known as Baba, also known as Aaron
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03474
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hantz et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04223
Plaintiff:
Mel Hantz and Sahee Lee Hantz
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Yusuf v. USA
as 2:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
Saheed Yusuf
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McGee v. Darrington Unit
as 4:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Eric Jervon McGee
Defendant:
Darrington Unit, Major Frederick Gooden, Sgt Oki Bey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUANN et al v. THE SUMMIT SCHOOL INC
as 2:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
RONNIE VINCENT QUANN, DEVON BATISTA, WILLIAM MAY and others
Defendant:
THE SUMMIT SCHOOL INC doing business as THE ACADEMY SCHOOLS trading as THE SUMMIT ACADEMY doing business as THE SUMMIT ACADEMY trading as THE ACADEMY SCHOOLS and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. USA
as 1:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Saheed Jamal Grant
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
