Cases 31 - 40 of 1,269
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jasthi et al v. USCIS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Sai Sri Jasthi and Sri Harsha Moturu
Defendant:
USCIS, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Mary Beth Brennan Seng and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
ROSE v. ATMOS NATION LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
SAI ROSE
Defendant:
ATMOS NATION LLC, CHARLY BENASSAYAG, ELI EROCH and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09396
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sayed v. Aponte
as 5:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
Hazhar A. Sayed
Defendant:
Operation Mgr. Linda I. Aponte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henshaw v. Wal-Mart Stores East LLC
as 6:2023cv02388
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marie Henshaw
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LLC, Wal-Mart Stores East, LLC and Saied Makled
Not Classified By Court:
Julie Walbroel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
