Cases 1 - 10 of 65
(PC) Coffer v. Ericson et al
as 2:2023cv02474
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Christopher Coffer
Defendant:
Ericson, Edwards, Grigsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffer v. Ericson et al
as 4:2023cv04295
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Coffer
Defendant:
Officer Ericson, Officer Edwards, Officer Grigsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Avco Corp v. Veronica Saltz Turner
as 22-3448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AVCO CORP
Defendant / Appellee:
VERONICA W. SALTZ TURNER
Purvenas Hayes v. Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky P.C.
as 2:2022cv02268
Plaintiff:
Desiree Purvenas Hayes
Defendant:
Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
PURVENAS HAYES v. SALTZ, MONGELUZZI & BENDESKY, P.C.
as 2:2022cv02277
Plaintiff:
DESIREE PURVENAS HAYES
Defendant:
SALTZ, MONGELUZZI & BENDESKY, P.C. and Robert J Mongeluzzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Tony Messer v. Bristol Compressors International, LLC
as 21-2363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY A. MESSER, PHILIP E. BARBROW, BENJIE G. HICKS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL COMPRESSOR, INCORPORATED, trading as Bristol Compressors
Defendant:
GARRISON INVESTMENT GROUP, LP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv81977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avco Corp v. Veronica Saltz Turner
as 21-2750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AVCO CORP
Defendant / Appellee:
VERONICA W. SALTZ TURNER
SALTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49075
Plaintiff:
CODY SALTZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
