Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-2240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, JOHN DOES #1 & 3 and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL HARRISON, IBRAHIM AHMED MOHOMED, ALLAN HAKKY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-2231
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, JOHN DOES #1 & 3 and others
Plaintiff:
ALLAN HAKKY and SAMANEH TAKALOO
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, ALLAN HAKKY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
International Refugee Assistance Project et al v. Trump et al
as 8:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
International Refugee Assistance Project , HIAS, Inc. , Allan Hakky and others
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump , Department of Homeland Security , Department of State and others
Amicu:
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program , Anti-Defamation League , Jewish Council for Public Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
