Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Davis v. Sheriff
as 3:2026cv00931
Petitioner:
Samuel Davis, Jr
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2026cv00812
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Warsaw Town of, Kosciusko County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Kosciusko County et al
as 3:2026cv00726
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Kosciusko County, Warsaw City of, Kosciusko County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warsaw City of et al
as 3:2026cv00694
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Warsaw City of, Quality Correctional Care, Tchepchat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Sheriff
as 3:2026cv00586
Petitioner:
Samuel Davis, Jr
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warsaw City of et al
as 3:2026cv00518
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Warsaw City of, Board of Trustee, Board of Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Sheriff
as 3:2026cv00515
Petitioner:
Samuel Davis, Jr
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Wilkie et al
as 3:2026cv00372
Plaintiff:
Samuel Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Wilkie, John Doe, Warsaw City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. The County of Erie et al
as 1:2026cv00380
Plaintiff:
Deyanna Davis
Defendant:
The County of Erie, Honorable Kenneth Case, John Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
