Cases 1 - 8 of 8
IN RE GEORGIA SENATE BILL 202
as 1:2021mi55555
Plaintiff:
The New Georgia Project, Black Voters Matter Fund, Rise, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant:
National Republican Congressional Committee and Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae:
Amicus Curiae, American Center for Law and Justice, Foundation for Government Accountability and others
Petitioner:
District of Columbia, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Senator Max Burns and others
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk of the Superio Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Concerned Black Clergy of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv01728
Plaintiff:
Exousia Lighthouse International C.M., Inc., Sankofa United Church of Christ Limited, Greater Works Ministeries Network, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, Anh Le, Rebecca Sullivan and others
Intervenor Defendant:
National Republican Congressional Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Georgia Republican Party, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
DEWITT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv08306
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DEWITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Samuel Dewitt v. USA
as 14-3762
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL DEWITT
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dewitt v. USA
as 3:2014cv00038
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Samuel Dewitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SHABBIR v. MOUNT HOLLY TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2011cv06786
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD SHABBIR
Defendant:
MOUNT HOLLY TOWNSHIP , FRANK PALLANTEE , SAMUEL DEWITT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Samuel McCotter
as 07-7738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMUEL DEWITT MCCOTTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
