Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HARMON v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2024cv05579
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HARMON
Defendant:
SCOTT PHILLIPS, JR. and ST. PAUL PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HARMON v. PHILLIPS
as 1:2023cv22974
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HARMON
Defendant:
SCOTT PHILLIPS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Adkins v. The Adamo Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Adkins
Cross Claimant:
The Adamo Group, Inc., Adamo Group, Adamo Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Adamo Demolition Company, Inc. of Florida, Adamo Demolition Company, Inc. DBA Adamo Group, Adamo Demolition Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. The Adamo Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Miller
Cross Claimant:
The Adamo Group, Inc., Adamo Demolition Company, Inc., Adamo Demolition Company and others
Defendant:
Adamo Group, Adamo Group, Inc., Adamo Demolition Company, Inc. of Florida and others
Cross Defendant:
SCM Engineer Demolition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARMON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv04850
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HARMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AYON et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03283
Plaintiff:
COULBOURNE RADER, JOSH EMMETT, MIGUEL AYON and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ayon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02219
Plaintiff:
Coulbourne Rader, Josh Emmett, Miguel Ayon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Samuel Harmon v. Robert Stevenson
as 16-6217
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL HARMON
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT STEVENSON
Harmon v. Stevenson
as 5:2015cv01620
Petitioner:
Samuel Harmon
Respondent:
Robert Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
