Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 93
Margo Benson-Hammer et al v. San Luis Obispo County et al
as 2:2019cv02790
Defendant: Tim Olivas, Ian Parkinson, San Luis Obispo County and others
Plaintiff: Margo Benson-Hammer and Estate of Russell Hammer
Estate Plaintiff: Russell Hammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00056
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: David Daleiden and Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jess D. Brasuell v. San Luis Obispo County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02320
Defendant: San Luis Obispo County Superior Court, Superior Court Clerk of San Luis Obispo County, San Luis Obispo County Jail and others
Plaintiff: Jess D. Brasuell, III and Jess D Brasuell, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al
as 3:2019mc80042
Defendant: David Daleiden, Sandra Merritt, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center For Choice, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Planned Parenthood Orange & San Bernardino Counties, Inc. and others
Respondent: StemExpress, LLC and Sarah Heuston
Receiver: Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc. and Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc. doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc et al v. Center for Medical Progress et al
as 2:2019mc00010
Defendant: Sandra Susan Merritt, Center for Medical Progress, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC and others
Respondent: DV Biologics and DaVinci Biosciences
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Planned Parenthood Rocky Mountains and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00009
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Receiver: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. Doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Respondent: StemExpress, LLC and Sarah Heuston
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
as 2:2019at00042
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Receiver: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. Doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc et al v. Center for Medical Progress et al
as 2:2019mc00007
Defendant: Center for Medical Progress, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC, Albin Rhomberg and others
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast and others
Respondent: Deborah Nucatola
Frances Gallardo v. County of San Luis Obispo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv09835
Defendant: County of San Luis Obispo, Officer Jonathan Calvert, Ian Parkinson and others
Plaintiff: Frances Gallardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Wayne Bonilla v. Los Angeles County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv08869
Defendant: Judge Glenn Yabuno, Orange County, San Luis Obispo County and others
Plaintiff: Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?