Cases 91 - 100 of 19,802
Morales-Sanchez v. Garland
as 24-2345
Petitioner:
CRESCENCIO MORALES-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Washington v. City Colleges of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02989
Plaintiff:
Takela Washington
Defendant:
City Colleges of Chicago and Ana Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sifuentes-Flores v. Garland
as 24-952
Petitioner:
KENJI JOSE SIFUENTES-FLORES, FIORELLA KATHERIN SANCHEZ-LANDA and HIROSHI KATSU SIFUENTES-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Merritt et al v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brad Merritt, Billy Cunningham, Daniel Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
Sanchez v. Hoyt
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Lorena Sanchez
Defendant:
Emery Hoyt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Robinson (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections Office of Legal Services et al
as 1:2024cv00988
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Robinson
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections Office of Legal Services, Adrienne Sanchez, Celia Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Weiser, et al
as 24-1141
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALLEN RICKS, SHANEL MOSSMAN, TIFFANY BALLAIN and others
Defendant:
PHILIP WEISER, JARED POLIS and ALL COUNTY JAILS AND COURTS OF COLORADO STATEWIDE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
USA v. Sanchez
as 24-50276
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Francisco Gonzalez Sanchez
Vasquez v. New Mexico Department Of Corrections, et al
as 24-2058
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VASQUEZ
Defendant:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALISHA TAFOYA-LUCERO, in her individual and official capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICERS SERVANDO ACOSTA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
