Cases 1 - 10 of 391
Dua v. Global Growth Holdings, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00911
Defendant:
GLOBAL GROWTH HOLDINGS, INC., ACADEMY ASSOCIATION, INC., BECKETT COLLECTIBLES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SANDEEP DUA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stonebraker et al v. LF2 Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Mason Stonebraker and Tiffany Edwards
Defendant:
LF2 Inc., LF4 Inc., LF7 Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Kamal et al
as 1:2024cv10851
Plaintiff:
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Manoj Kamal and Sandeep Bedi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
In re: Subpoena Directed to Sandeep Sahota by Crowe LLP
as 3:2024mc80040
Not Yet Classified:
Sandeep Sahota
Respondent:
Crowe LLP
Fowler v. BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
KELLY FOWLER
Defendant:
June Bray, Sandeep Laumas, Vimal Mehta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Whitmore v. Patel et al.
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Sidney Whitmore
Defendant:
Sandeep Patel and Sheena Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Korff v. Mehta et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Janice Korff
Defendant:
Vimal Mehta, Robert Risinger, Richard I. Steinhart and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
