Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cox v. Board of Parole et al
as 8:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Travis Cox
Defendant:
Board of Parole, Office of Parole Supervision, Office of Parole Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Sanders v. Warden Hazlwood et al
as 8:2017cv00307
Defendant:
Barbara Rickard, United States of America, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Cruickshank et al
as 4:2017cv03020
Respondent:
Richard Cruickshank and Scott R. Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Ricky J. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Sanders v. Lutter et al
as 4:2013cv03167
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska, Douglas County, Nebraska, Richard Lutter and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gadekan v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2012cv03208
Defendant:
1-100 Unknown USDA Officials, 1-100 non-USDA employees, Beverly Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Gadekan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
