Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nichols v. Avlon Industries et al
as 1:2023cv16776
Plaintiff: Sandra Nichols
Defendant: Avlon Industries and Namaste Laboratories LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nicholls v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08987
Plaintiff: Sandra Nicholls
Defendant: Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dunn et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv01846
Plaintiff: Peggy Dunn , Theresa Archie , Delia Armendariz and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Compaines, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00069
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dunn et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv01953
Plaintiff: Peggy Dunn , Theresa Archie , Delia Armendariz and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris & Morris, PSC, et al v. Gayle Slaughter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5501
Plaintiff: KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: MORRIS & MORRIS P.S.C.
Defendant - Appellee: LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, Individually and official capacity, JAMES AMATO and others
Keith Guy, Sr., et al v. LFUCG, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5496
Plaintiff: KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: REX ROE #48, #62, #91, #97, #103, On behalf of themselves and all others who are similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, in official and individual capacity, JAMES AMATO, Individually and others
Dyer v Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv00035
Plaintiff: Sandra Nichols Dyer
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Commissioner Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00664
Plaintiff: Sandra Nichols
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00097
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Bankruptcy None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?