Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Aho et al v. Cass County et al
as 0:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Aho and Chad Cane
Defendant:
Cass County, Sandy Bennett, Jerri Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sembuge et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02763
Plaintiff:
Alfred Sembuge, Rogers Twinamasiko, Willy Friday Turinawe and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Strickland v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
Sandi Strickland
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Rubbelke et al v. Zarembinski et al
as 0:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubbelke and Anna Rubbelke
Defendant:
Sandy Zarembinski, Maximillia Utley, Catrina Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Sandy Flores
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Clervrain et al v. Coffman et al
as 0:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Delzs Rigarte Cineus
Defendant:
Cynthia Coffman, Jared Polis, Philip J. Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Maddox III v. Sather et al
as 0:2020cv00645
Defendant:
Sara Johnson, John Grey, Ebenezer Tope Adebara and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Maddox III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Walz et al
as 0:2019cv02612
Defendant:
Bill Pal-Freeman, Michelle Smith, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
