Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 125
Michael Farrow v. Sara Revell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6804
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL ANTHONY FARROW
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN SARA M. REVELL
Najib Shemami v. Sara Revell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6658
Petitioner - Appellant: NAJIB SHEMAMI
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN SARA M. REVELL
Harned v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013ct03068
Plaintiff: Keith V. Harned
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Travis Monroe v. Sara Revell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6364
Petitioner - Appellant: TRAVIS SENTELL MONROE
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN SARA M. REVELL
Spigner v. Revell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00343
Petitioner: Michael Spigner
Respondent: Sara M. Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burk v. Revell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00254
Petitioner: William Michael Burk, Jr.
Respondent: Sara M. Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Farrow v. Revell
as 5:2012hc02193
Petitioner: Michael Farrow
Respondent: Sara M. Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reece v. Holder et al
as 5:2012hc02192
Petitioner: Marcus St. John Reece
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Sara M. Revell and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spigner v. Revell
as 5:2012hc02190
Petitioner: Michael Spigner
Respondent: Sara M. Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Daniel, et al
as 12-1287
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTOINE JONES
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES DANIEL, BLAKE R. DAVIS, SARA M. REVELL and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?