Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Nathaniel Williams v. Yes Care Corp.
as 24-6333
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
YES CARE CORP., SARAH JOHNSON, RN, DR. CLEM, M.D. and others
Avant v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Cordell Avant
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Rob Jeffreys, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. ECI - East and Medical Department, et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Lorne Woods
Defendant:
ECI - East and Medical Department, R.N. Sarah Johnson, Dr. Raab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McGruder v. Perez et al
as 1:2023cv01597
Plaintiff:
Tony McGruder
Defendant:
Victor M. Perez, K. Young, J. Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Yes Care Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathaniel Williams
Defendant:
ECI Health Department, RN Sarah Jhonson, NP Stephanie Cyran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2022cv04142
Plaintiff:
Victor Nunez
Defendant:
Robert Hamilton, . Rankin, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellison v. Finley et al
as 3:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Bennie K. Ellison
Defendant:
Craig Finley, Christina Batson, Kevin Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles McRae v. Debbie Knauer, et al
as 22-1909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES A. MCRAE
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBBIE KNAUER, ARB Member, IDOC, SHANNON N. MYERS, LESLIE MCCARTY, ARB Member, IDOC and others
Charles McRae v. Shannon Myers, et al
as 22-1821
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES A. MCRAE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANNON N. MYERS, LESLIE MCCARTY, DEBBIE KNAUER and others
Williams v. Spiller et al
as 3:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Williams
Defendant:
William A. Spiller, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Jason N. Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
