Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Nathaniel Williams v. Yes Care Corp.
as 24-6333
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
YES CARE CORP., SARAH JOHNSON, RN, DR. CLEM, M.D. and others
Avant v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Cordell Avant
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Rob Jeffreys, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. ECI - East and Medical Department, et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Lorne Woods
Defendant:
ECI - East and Medical Department, R.N. Sarah Johnson, Dr. Raab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Yes Care Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathaniel Williams
Defendant:
ECI Health Department, RN Sarah Jhonson, NP Stephanie Cyran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellison v. Finley et al
as 3:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Bennie K. Ellison
Defendant:
Craig Finley, Christina Batson, Kevin Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Spiller et al
as 3:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Williams
Defendant:
William A. Spiller, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Jason N. Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McRae v. Lockett et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Andre McRae
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Clayton et al
as 1:2021cv01062
Defendant:
CO II Adrian Christopher, Warden Walter West, Lt. William Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hicks v. Williams et al
as 5:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Randy White, Kelli Elliott, Steve Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Donald Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Waggon et al
as 3:2019cv00845
Defendant:
S. Waggon, Officer Streeter, Officer Pajeau and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick H Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
