Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02013
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Frosh et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2026cv03044
Plaintiff: David Frosh and Sari Frosh
Defendant: American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Type: Contract Insurance
Kunin et al v. Ford Motor Co., et al
as 2:2026cv02098
Plaintiff: Steve Kunin and Sari Kunin
Defendant: Ford Motor Company and Autonation Ford Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Kunin et al v. Ford Motor Co., et al
as 2:2026at00991
Plaintiff: Steve Kunin and Sari Kunin
Defendant: Ford Motor Company and Autonation Ford Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
United States of America v. Bloch et al
as 8:2026cv02210
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Robert Bloch and Sari K Bloch
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability - Authorization to collect via civil action
BEY v. GREGGS
as 2:2026cv04623
Plaintiff: ADMIRAL ALA'AD-DIN BEY
Defendant: SARI E. GREGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Sari Tacuri v. Blanche
as 26-1086
Petitioner: EDGAR PATRICIO SARI TACURI and TERESA CARMELA TITO SALDANA
Respondent: TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bossira v. The State of Israel et al
as 1:2026cv01700
Plaintiff: Jacob Israel Bossira
Defendant: The State of Israel, The Israeli Judiciary, Yitzhack Amit and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
US v. Ahmed Sary
as 26-6260
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: AHMED M. SARY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01189
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?