Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Saulsbury Industries, Inc. v. Western Refining Southwest Inc.
as 4:2019cv04134
Defendant:
Western Refining Southwest Inc. and Western Refining, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Saulsbury Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saulsbury Industries, Inc. v. Western Refining Southwest Inc.
as 3:2019cv00224
Counter Plaintiff:
Western Refining Southwest Inc.
Plaintiff:
Saulsbury Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saulsbury Industries, Inc. v. The Babcock & Wilcox Company
as 1:2019cv00771
Counter Claimant:
The Babcock & Wilcox Company
Plaintiff:
Saulsbury Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
C L E C O Power L L C v. Saulsbury Industries Inc
as 1:2019cv00269
Plaintiff:
CLECO Power, LLC and C L E C O Power L L C
Defendant:
Saulsbury Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saulsbury Industries Inc v. Cabot Corporation et al
as 6:2019cv00007
Defendant:
Cleco Power L L C and Cabot Corp
Plaintiff:
Saulsbury Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryer v. Saulsbury Industries, Inc.
as 7:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
James Bryer
Defendant:
Saulsbury Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
McGough v. Saulsbury Industries, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02687
Plaintiff:
Michael McGough
Defendant:
Saulsbury Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kilmon v. Saulsbury Industries, Inc.
as 7:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Michael Kilmon,
Defendant:
Saulsbury Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
