Cases 31 - 40 of 310
Sayles v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv61071
Plaintiff:
Marcia Sayles
Defendant:
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Sayles v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv01948
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Sayles
Defendant:
Chief Sheriff Melody Maddox, Larandy Akies and Dr. Barton Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayles v. City of Tulsa
as 4:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D Sayles and Lawrence Sayles
Defendant:
City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Sayles v. Alameda County Superior Court
as 2:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
Walter Sayles
Defendant:
Alameda County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sayles v Nunn
as 4:2021cv00565
Petitioner:
Bobby C Sayles
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. John Sayles
as 21-4650
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT SAYLES
Sayles v. International Business Machines, Corp.
as 1:2021cv09703
Plaintiff:
Andrea Sayles
Defendant:
International Business Machines, Corp. and International Business Machines Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Britanny Sayles et al v. Natural Nine, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv09040
Plaintiff:
Britanny Sayles and Channelle Clark
Defendant:
Natural Nine, Inc. dba Sam's Hofbrau, Alan Kiyoshi Minato, Doe Managers 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
