Cases 31 - 40 of 949
Simone Dickson v. Joseph Biden
as 23-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIMONE DICKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., President, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President, GILBERT R. CISNEROS, JR. and others
Phillips v. Ranger Oil Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04547
Plaintiff:
Mary Phillips
Defendant:
Ranger Oil Corporation, Edward Geiser, Darrin Henke and others
Johnson v. Ranger Oil Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04570
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Ranger Oil Corporation, Edward Geiser, Darrin Henke and others
Baughman et al v. BOTTOM LINE CONCEPTS LLC
as 1:2023cv21862
Plaintiff:
Zachary Charles Baughman and George Schmidt
Defendant:
BOTTOM LINE CONCEPTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
O'Dell v. Ranger Oil Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv03957
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Ranger Oil Corporation, Edward Geiser, Darrin Henke and others
Stacia Stiner, et al v. Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., et al
as 23-80030
Petitioner:
STACIA STINER, LORESIA VALLETTE, Guardian Ad Litem for Lawrence Quinlan, HEATHER FISHER, Guardian Ad Litem for Ralph Schmidt and others
Respondent:
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC. and BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC
OptumRX, Inc. v. Schmidt & Sons Pharmacy of Tecumseh, Inc.
as 0:2023cv00811
Petitioner:
OptumRX, Inc.
Respondent:
Schmidt & Sons Pharmacy of Tecumseh, Inc. doing business as Schmidt & Sons Pharmacy of Tecumseh
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Schmidt, al v. Rundell et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Maple Beach Ventures One, LLC, Eric Schmidt, AS Management, LLC and others
Defendant:
Derek Rundell, Tennyson Company, LLC, Maple Beach Ventures, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Schmidt v. Safe Home Security Inc
as 3:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Rodney Schmidt
Defendant:
Safe Home Security Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
