Torts - Injury Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Elorreaga et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv05696
Defendant: ABB, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc., ITT Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Roberto Elorreaga and Rosemary Elorreaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Polly Gastrom v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv10464
Plaintiff: Polly Gastrom and Suzzane Nesbit
Defendant: Vigor Industrial LLC, 3M Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sibley v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv07697
Plaintiff: Christopher George Sibley and Maria Sibley
Defendant: Blackmer Pump Company, EATON CORPORATION individually and sii to Vickers Pump;, VIKING PUMP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Speck v. 3M Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05845
Defendant: VIGOR INDUSTRIAL LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to TODD SHIPYARD CORPORATION), 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING, MetalClad Insulation LLC and others
Plaintiff: John Speck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Wilgenbusch et al v. Fryer-Knowles, Inc., A Washington Corporation
as 4:2019cv05620
Plaintiff: Judith A. Wilgenbusch and Ronald C. Wilgenbusch
Defendant: Fryer-Knowles, Inc., A Washington Corporation, Darcoid Company of California, Lockheed Shipbuilding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Randolph Morton et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05956
Defendant: Schneider Electric USA Inc, Union Carbide Corporation, -, CBS Corporation (f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger with CBS CORPORATION f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to BF STURTEVANT) and others
Plaintiff: Edna S. Morton and Randolph Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Brian Houghton v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03133
Plaintiff: Brian Houghton, Stanley Houghton, Susan Effinger and others
Defendant: SYD Carpenter, Marine Contractor, Inc., Hennessy Industries, Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Stephen N Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
DeGuzman et al v. Crane Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02228
Defendant: Crane Co. , Allied Fluid Products Corp. , Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Jaime DeGuzman and Loida DeGuzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?