Cases 11 - 20 of 28
James Curry v. United States Supreme Court
as 20-6243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk of Court for Supreme Court of the United States and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Momolu Sirleaf v. Scott Harris
as 20-6213
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States ("Scotus"), LYNDA BURROWS, Mailroom Clerk, BARBARA MIKELJOHN, Clerk, Circuit Court of Montgomery County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRIEST MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, Pharaoh & Priest and COMMONWEALTH OF ISRAEL
Simuel v. Harris et al
as 5:2019ct03267
Defendant:
Michael Duggan, Scott S. Harris and Laurie Wood
Plaintiff:
Dontez Lamont Simuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Curry v. United States Supreme Court
as 19-6836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk of Court for Supreme Court of the United States and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Dontez Simuel v. Scott Harris
as 19-6743
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA D. NESBITT, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States and REDMOND K. BARNES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL
Shawndell McFarlin v. Scott Harris
as 19-6455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWNDELL MONTE MCFARLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS
Simuel v. Harris et al
as 5:2019ct03017
Defendant:
Lisa Nesbitt, Scott S. Harris and Redmond K. Barnes
Plaintiff:
Dontez Lamont Simuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFarlin v. Harris
as 2:2018cv03198
Plaintiff:
Shawndell Monte McFarlin
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawndell Monte McFarlin v. Scott S. Harris
as 18-6095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWNDELL MONTE MCFARLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS and REDMOND K. BARNES
Hankins v. Brunswick County et al
as 5:2018ct03022
Plaintiff:
Freeman Leroy Hankins
Defendant:
Brunswick County, Rex Gore, Jon David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
