Cases 31 - 40 of 183
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
Foye v. Harris et al
as 5:2022ct03205
Plaintiff:
Delgen Foye
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Clayton R. Higgins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Hunt et al
as 1:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Isaiah S. Harris, Sr., Isaiah S. Harris, Jr., Iyana S. Harris and others
Defendant:
Deborah S. Hunt, Clarence Maddox, Susan Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darcy v. Harris et al
as 5:2022ct03196
Plaintiff:
Alan Peter Darcy
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris, Michael E. Horowitz, Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Massey v. Harris et al
as 5:2022ct03111
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Lee Massey
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Lisa Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00697
Petitioner:
BRENDA A. PATTERSON
Respondent:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, KRISTEN M. CLARKE and ANGELA D. CAESAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-5190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peters v. Harris
as 22-20094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott S. Harris, Supreme Court Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
