Cases 1 - 10 of 2,777
United States v. Scott Johnson
as 24-1769
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Scott Howard Johnson
JOHNSON v. PADGETT et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A JOHNSON
Defendant:
R PADGETT and R GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Barry P. Johnson, Barry N. Johnson, Scott J. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10052
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24206
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arroyo v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Joel Arroyo
Defendant:
Scott Douglas Johnson and Kinder Morgan Vehicle Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Scott JohnsonIn re: Scott Johnson
as 22-2198
Petitioner:
In re: SCOTT DAVID JOHNSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY
JOHNSON v. OBERLANDER et al
as 5:2022cv02171
Petitioner:
SCOTT DAVID JOHNSON
Respondent:
DERICK F. OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. SHULER et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
J SHULER, K PEARSON, MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayco Saunders v. Raleigh County
as 21-2163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYCO SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
RALEIGH COUNTY, SOUTHERN REGIONAL JAIL, CITY OF BECKLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
