Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Zinsky et al v Medline Industries, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04932
Plaintiff:
Michael Zinsky and Scott Case
Defendant:
Medline Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lehmann v. Betacom, Inc.
as 0:2015cv61846
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lehmann , Michael Futch and Scott Case
Defendant:
Betacom, Inc.
Mediator:
Anne Marie Estevez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Brian Dorsey v. McFarlin, et al
as 14-20451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN DORSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN MCFARLIN, MRS. SCOTT, Case Counselor, MAJOR VAUGHN and others
Jesus Valles, Jr. v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 12-10338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS VALLES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Washington, D.C., GERARDO MALDONADO, JR., Regional Director, South Central Region, Bureau of Prisons, Dallas, Texas, KAREN EDENFIELD, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Big Spring, Texas and others
RYPIEN v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv01496
Plaintiff:
MARK RYPIEN , TERRY HANRATTY , KELLY HANRATTY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RYPIEN v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as PAE/2:12-cv-01496
Plaintiff:
MARK RYPIEN , TERRY HANRATTY , KELLY HANRATTY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Carrothers v. Presley, et al
as 07-60356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO CARROTHERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT PRESLEY, Warden, Area III, JOHN RODGERS, Deputy Warden, Area III, DARLESTER FOSTER, Associate Warden, Area III and others
Case v. Stewart
as 07-1052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DAVID CASE, as Personal Representative for the Estate of David Scott Case
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCOTT CASE, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
M. C. STEWART and GASTON COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.