Cases 71 - 79 of 79
GARZA v. HARGAN et al
as 1:2017cv02122
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE GARZA
Defendant:
ERIC HARGAN , STEPHEN WAGNER and SCOTT LLOYD
Movant:
STATE OF TEXAS , STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Turner v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv03390
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does #1-3 and Officer Scott Lloyd
Plaintiff:
Nathan Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates v. State of Alabama, The et al
as 4:2011cv02183
Plaintiff:
Darren Bates
Defendant:
State of Alabama, The, Marshall County, Alabama, Dekalb County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01268
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Scott Lloyd, New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hernandez and Louis Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdul Ali Nasher, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 08-5345
Petitioner - Appellee:
Abdul Rahim Hussein M Ali Nasher and Scott Lloyd Fenstermaker, As Next Friend of Abdul Rahim Hussein Muhammed Ali Nashir
Respondent - Appellant:
Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Commander of the Joint Task Force, GTMO and Commander of Prison Camp, GTMO
Altamirano et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv00676
Plaintiff:
Aaron Altamirano and Jonathan Robinson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Scott Lloyd, Undercover Police Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roebuck v. Davis et al
as 4:2007cv01194
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Roebuck
Defendant:
Nelda Davis, Amanda Akin, Margaret Dutton Cherokee Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
