Cases 1 - 10 of 484
Scully v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WACHTEL, TONG B. TRAN and ALISON SCULLY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Rashimer Swafford v. Tobbie B. Waxman Esq. et al
as 2:2024cv03381
Plaintiff:
Rashimer Swafford
Defendant:
Tobbie B. Waxman Esq. and Elizabeth Scully
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
TWYMAN v. FAIR OAKS et al
as 2:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. TWYMAN
Defendant:
FAIR OAKS, SCULLY MANAGEMENT and MARGARET CHILDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Scully v. AVM Biotechnology, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03190
Plaintiff:
James B Scully
Defendant:
AVM Biotechnology, Inc, Theresa Deisher, Daniel Spina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Scully
as 1:2024cv03185
Plaintiff:
James B Scully
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hernaiz v. Wagner et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Esteban Hernaiz
Defendant:
Wagner, McKenna, Rosado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernaiz v. Wagner et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Esteban Hernaiz
Defendant:
Wagner, McKenna, Rosado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernaiz v. Wagner et al
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Esteban Hernaiz
Defendant:
Wagner, Rosado, McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Heather Picquelle v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Heather Picquelle
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, GRFLISE, Xin Xiu Lai and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
