Cases 1 - 10 of 310
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ryan v. State of et al
as 4:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, MDOC, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility and others
Maxie v. St Joseph County of et al
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Michael Maxie
Defendant:
St Joseph County of, Katlyn Foust Hunneshagen, Sean Michael Towner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sean CaseyIn re: Sean Casey
as 24-10808
Petitioner:
In re: SEAN MICHAEL CASEY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Ryan v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2024cv10672
Plaintiff:
Sean Ryan and Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Bureau of Health Care Services, Heidi Washington and others
Lemke v. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lemke and Angel Marie
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, Jerome Greenfield, Nichole Francis and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Crane et al
as 2:2024cv10539
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Crane, Ulch, Napier and others
(HC)Vasko v. Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
as 1:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
Sean Michael Vasko
Respondent:
Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Vasko v. Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
as 2:2024cv00427
Petitioner:
Sean Michael Vasko
Respondent:
Amador County Jail (Sheriff)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Vasko v. Amador County Jail
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Vasko
Defendant:
Amador County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
