Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CHRIST KINGDOM BUILDING WORSHIP CENTER et al v. LBC2 REO LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
CHRIST KINGDOM BUILDING WORSHIP CENTER and ELLEN WALLACE-SEARCY
Defendant:
LBC2 REO LLC, LBC2 TRUST, ASSET MANAGEMENT ALLIANCE LLC d/b/a ONE ALLIANCE COMPANIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEARCY v. KIMBROUGH
as 1:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
QUINTIN M. SEARCY
Respondent:
BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SEARCY v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00208
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BILLY WARREN, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTIN SEARCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Sullivan
as 5:2020hc02013
Petitioner:
Edgar Searcy
Respondent:
B. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Searcy v. Smith
as 5:2016hc02019
Petitioner:
Edgar Searcy
Respondent:
Thomas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015hc02292
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248
Searcy v. Lynch et al
as 5:2015ct03282
Plaintiff:
Edgar Searcy
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Mr. Samuels and Unnamed Subordinates and Contract Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Searcy v. Eastern District of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03190
Plaintiff:
Edgar Searcy
Defendant:
Eastern District of North Carolina, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Searcy v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 5:2015hc02126
Petitioner:
Edgar Searcy
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General and United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hagins v. Searcy et al
as 3:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis Hagins
Defendant:
Lohr Scott Searcy , Jeanne A. Miller , Melvin Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
