Cases 1 - 10 of 14
ROSS v. CODY et al
as 4:2019cv00097
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GREGORY ROSS, JR.
Defendant:
CODY, RUPERT and VIRGIL SEAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant:
BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
SEAY v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv00161
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DP REPORT RECORDED POLICE OFFICERS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
TAMIE SEAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEAY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03729
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD V. SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Seay v. USA
as 3:2017cv00678
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Rapheal Seay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEAY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2010cv01559
Medical Service Provider For D.O.C:
CORRECTIONS MEDICAL SERVICES C.M.S.
Last Name) Correctional / K-9 Officer (P.C.F:
DAUGHERTY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE LEMMON and T. WHITE
Plaintiff:
GARRY SEAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seay v. Levenhagen
as 2:2010cv00436
Petitioner:
Herbert D Seay
Respondent:
Mark Levenhagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
