Cases 11 - 20 of 988
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-30188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nelson v. Mayorkas
as 24-1117
Plaintiff:
CAMERON NELSON
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, United Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
L v. Decker
as 24-718
Petitioner:
J L
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Al Kayyali et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
ZUHA AL KAYYALI, Malka Hamad and AYAD ALGAYYALI
Defendant:
Lisa Johnson, Alamdar Hamdani, Dos and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
