Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Charleston Automotive Company et al v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Charleston Automotive Company doing business as Rick Hendrick BMW Charleston, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Hendrick Automotive Group
Daniels-Owens et al v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al
as 5:2021cv00164
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Cintas Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Lakeatia Daniels-Owens and Estate of Leroy Owens
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
MedARC LLC v. Care Improvement Plus Group Management LLC et al
as 6:2020cv03427
Defendant:
Hewitt Coleman & Associates LLC, Planned Administrators Inc, United Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
MedARC LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hagy v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00509
Plaintiff:
Amy Worley Hagy
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. , Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. , ACE American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Hedstrom v. Bridgestone Americas Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03581
Plaintiff:
Keith Hedstrom
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Inc and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc v. Claims Verification Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00081
Defendant:
Claims Verification Inc and Kenneth Osborne
Plaintiff:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
BROWN v. SEDGEWICK CLAIMS MANAGMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2011cv00084
Defendant:
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MILDRED BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
