Cases 1 - 10 of 916
Flores Segura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2513
Petitioner:
ERIC FRANK FLORES SEGURA, JOHANA ALEXANDRA VIGNOLO ESPINOZA, ARELY MARIANA FLORES VIGNOLO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Segura, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al.
as 24-2445
Plaintiff:
MARIA SEGURA, individually and as Successor in Interest to Nicholas Segura, deceased, MANUEL SEGURA, individually and as Successor in Interest to Nicholas Segura, deceased and VICTOR SEGURA, individually
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CARLOS CASTILLO and JONATHAN KEIL
STIER, ESQ v. POSSEBON et al
as 3:2024cv04647
Defendant:
TW BRASIL LTDA, EMPIRE STRONG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INTERMEDIATION, LLC, DIEGO POSSEBON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN H. STIER, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRUTOS-Segura v. Garland
as 24-1955
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE FRUTOS-SEGURA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Segura v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Edward Segura
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Obregon-Segura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1527
Petitioner:
MERCY BANEZA OBREGON-SEGURA and LEILANY MAYORGA-OBREGON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Anthony v. Segura
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Marian Anthony
Defendant:
Judge Daniel Segura
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Lewis v. Segura et al
as 4:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Chauncey T. Lewis
Defendant:
Sgt. G. Segura, D. Moreno and J. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
