Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Williams v. Selective Service System
as 24-1735
Petitioner:
KEVIN R. WILLIAMS, SR.
Respondent:
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
Valame v. Biden, et al.
as 24-369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIKRAM VALAME
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, CRAIG T. BROWN, JOEL C. SPANGENBERG and others
Valame v. Biden et al
as 5:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
Vikram Valame
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden, Craig T. Brown, Joel C. Spangenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe et al v. Selective Service System, United States
as 4:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Selective Service System, United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
National Coalition for Men, et al v. Selective Service System, et al
as 19-20272
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD BENSON, as Director of Selective Service System, LAWRENCE G. ROMO, as Director of Selective Service System and SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES LESMEISTER, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and NATIONAL COALITION FOR MEN
National Coalition for Men et al v. Selective Service System et al
as 4:2016cv03362
Plaintiff:
National Coalition for Men and James Lesmeister
Defendant:
Selective Service System , Lawrence G Romo and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Robinson v. Equifax et al
as 5:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Dayrin L Robinson
Defendant:
Equifax, Experian, Transunion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KYLE v. SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM et al
as 2:2015cv05193
Plaintiff:
ALLISON MARIE KYLE
Defendant:
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM and LAWRENCE G. ROMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunter v. Selective Service System
as 2:2015cv00812
Plaintiff:
Edward Hunter, Jr.
Defendant:
Selective Service System
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
