Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Service Corporation International, Inc. et al v. Travelers Property Casualty Company Of America
as 4:2018cv03740
Plaintiff:
Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and Service Corporation International, Inc.
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis Johnson, et al v. Serenity Transportation, Inc., et al
as 18-80094
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
CURTIS JOHNSON and GARY JOHNSON
Defendant - Respondent:
SERENITY TRANSPORTATION, INC., DAVID FRIEDEL, SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
SCHAEFER et al v. SCI PENNSYLVANIA FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04960
Plaintiff:
MARJORIE SCHAEFER and CAROLINE BERNSTEIN
Defendant:
SCI PENNSYLVANIA FUNERAL SERVICES, INC. and SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1715
Curtis Johnson v. Serenity Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02004
Plaintiff:
Curtis Johnson
Defendant:
Serenity Transportation, Inc. , David Friedel , Service Corporation International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DEVINSKAYA v. SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03630
Plaintiff:
MAYA DEVINSKAYA
Defendant:
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL INC. , SCI PENNSYLVANIA FUNERAL SERVICES INC. , FOREST HILLS CEMETERY CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris-Brown v. Service Corporation International, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01014
Defendant:
Service Corporation International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH R. MORRIS-BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
TAGHULK PROPRIETARY V SERVICE CORP
as 04-1201
Defendant:
BATESVILLE CASKET COMPANY
Defendant-Appellee:
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
TAGHULK PROPRIETARY, LTD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
