Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Harris v. Langley et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Harris
Defendant:
Terry Langley, Carroll County, Lt Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Langley
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Charles Harris
Respondent:
Sheriff Terry Langley, LT Henderson, Carroll County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowe v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv00724
Defendant:
Robert Steinbach, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sgt Harrison Porter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Steward Shaw, Officer A. Johnson, Officer Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dennis Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley v. Bennett et al
as 3:2020cv00144
Plaintiff:
Aaron Tarrie Ashley, Sr.
Defendant:
C.O. Boyd, C.O. Cason, Sgt. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcellin v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv02076
Defendant:
City of New York, SGT HARRISON BERKOWITZ, P.O. MICHAEL MERCURIO and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN MARCELLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv10491
Plaintiff:
Larry Jackson
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidie Washington, Jordan and others
Lisle, Jr. v. Butler et al
as 3:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly Butler, Susan Hill, Brad Bramlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin Odom v. Bill Oldham, et al
as 14-6281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEMETRIUS ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL OLDHAM, Shelby County Sheriff, KIM PALMER, LT. WARD and others
Marvin Odom v. Bill Oldham, et al
as 14-6251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN DEMETRIUS ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL OLDHAM, Shelby County Sheriff, KIM PALMER, CHIEF MOORE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
