Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Committee to Save the Derry Rail Trail Tunnel et al v. Bhatt et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Committee to Save the Derry Rail Trail Tunnel and Rails to Trails Conservancy
Defendant:
Shailen Bhatt, Patrick Bauer and NH Department of Transportation, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Shailen Bhatt, et al
as 24-5193
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, And Agencies, Including the Rhode Island Department of Transportation, Shailen Bhatt, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Rhode Island Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
Narragansett Indian Tribe, Acting By and Through the Narragansett Indian Tribal Historic Preservation Office
Amicus Curiae:
United South and Eastern Tribes Sovereignty Protection Fund
Milwaukee Inner City Congregations Allied for Hope et al v. US Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club Wisconsin Chapter, Milwaukee Inner City Congregations Allied for Hope, 1000 Friends of Wisconsin Inc and others
Defendant:
Craig Thompson, Federal Highway Administration, Secretary Pete Buttigieg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
No More Freeways et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2024cv01311
Defendant:
United States Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation and Shailen Bhatt
Plaintiff:
Neighbors for Clean Air, Association Of Oregon Rail and Transit Advocates, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
East Side Parkways Coalition et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Bernadette M Madiana, Wayne Blassingame, Western New York Youth Climate Council and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, New York State Department of Transportation, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
KY, et al v. FHWA, et al
as 24-5532
Plaintiff:
STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF WYOMING and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PETER PAUL MONTGOMERY BUTTIGIEG, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation and others
State of TX v. U.S. Dept of Trans
as 24-10470
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Department of Transportation
Defendant:
Shailen Bhatt, in his official capacity, as Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, Pete Buttigieg, in his official capacity, as Secretary of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and others
Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Federal Highway Administration
as 24-1447
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, FRIENDS OF MOSES HALL, NORTHERN VIRGINIA CITIZENS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
GREGORY MURRILL, in his official capacity as Maryland Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, PAUL J. WIEDEFELD, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Maryland Department of Transportation, SHAILEN BHATT, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Town of Hempstead et al v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority et al
as 2:2024cv03263
Plaintiff:
Town of Hempstead, Donald X. Clavin, Jr. and Federal Highway Administration
Defendant:
Defendant Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, SHAILEN BHATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mulgrew et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
Michael Mulgrew, Afl-Cio, Vito J. Fossella and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York City Municipal Labor Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
