Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Town of Hempstead et al v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority et al
as 2:2024cv03263
Plaintiff:
Town of Hempstead, Donald X. Clavin, Jr. and Federal Highway Administration
Defendant:
Defendant Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, SHAILEN BHATT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mulgrew et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
Michael Mulgrew, Afl-Cio, Vito J. Fossella and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York City Municipal Labor Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Nat'l Trust for Historic Pres. in the US, et al v. Buttigieg, et al
as 24-1138
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION, FRIENDS OF THE FRANK J. WOOD BRIDGE, HISTORIC BRIDGE FOUNDATION and others
Defendant:
PETER PAUL MONTGOMERY BUTTIGIEG, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation, SHAILEN BHATT, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, TODD JORGENSEN, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Highway Administration Maine Division and others
Rethink35 et al v. Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Rethink35, Save Our Springs Alliance, Austin Justice Coalition and others
Defendant:
Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), Marc Williams, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, Danny Buzzetta, Dr. Gregor Winkel and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mulgrew et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MULGREW, AFL-CIO, Vito J. Fossella and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of South Dakota, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Interested Party:
The American Road and Transportation Builders Association and The Associated General Contractors of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Transportation et al
as 5:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Department of Transportation
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Road and Transportation Builders Association and Associated General Contractors of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chan et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2023cv10365
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Chan, Tamara Hoffman and Does 1 through 200
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SOKOLICH et al v. US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2023cv21728
Plaintiff:
As Mayor of Fort Lee MARK SOKOLICH, RICHARD GALLER and MARK SOKOLICH
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, in official capacity SHAILEN BHATT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
