Cases 11 - 20 of 173
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kendall Shaka Broughton v. B. Chavarria et al
as 2:2022cv05530
Plaintiff:
Kendell Shaka Broughton
Defendant:
B. Chavarria, R. Flores-Borunda, J. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. MS. JESSICA MAN et al
as 2:2022cv02786
Plaintiff:
STAMAR MILLER
Defendant:
MS. JESSICA MAN and MR. SHAKA MZEE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trendtex Fabrics, Ltd. v NTKN, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Trendtex Fabrics, Ltd.
Defendant:
NTKN, Inc., Hung Ky, Shaka Time, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
United States of America v. Wilson
as 5:2022mc50780
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ken Kenyatta Wilson
Interested Party:
Shaka Wilson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GREENE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66461
Plaintiff:
SHAKA GREENE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PA v. SHAKA INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01290
Plaintiff:
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PA
Defendant:
SHAKA INC. and J.C. KONO MOROSKY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. SHAKA EPOXY INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01291
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
SHAKA EPOXY INC. and J.C. KONO MOROSKY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Williams v. Latona
as 9:2021cv01058
Petitioner:
Shaka Williams
Respondent:
L. Latona and Letita James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
