Cases 1 - 10 of 211
Loraine v. Steuben County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Edward Loraine
Defendant:
Steuben County Sheriff, Braxton Amos, Shane Matchette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLEY v. GILMAN et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALLEN WILLEY
Defendant:
TONI GILMAN, PARKE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and PARKE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester-Spann v. Franke et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Carren Franke, Jeremy K. Nix, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STILTS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
SHANE D. STILTS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCCAMMON v. GUTLING et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALLEN MCCAMMON
Defendant:
GUTLING, WOODS, TITUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester-Spann v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Shane M Hester-Spann
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton, Carren Franke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elzey et al v. Newton et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey, Kortney Elzey, Dustin Havens, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Chris Newton, Jennifer Newton and 24/7 Towing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrold v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Shane A Harrold and Shane Harrold
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Alliance RV, LLC
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Shane Bradley
Defendant:
Alliance RV, LLC
Other:
Michael Scopelitis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
HAWKINS v. SHAW et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HAWKINS
Defendant:
SHAW, SHANE NELSON and BRYON VANDERVORT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
