Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HARVEY v. FOLLY et al
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
HOLLY HARVEY
Defendant:
KEVIN M FOLLY and SHANNON A ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Shannon Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 17-10331
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHANNON DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
ROBINSON v. JONES et al.
as 5:2016cv00065
Petitioner:
SHANNON DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Respondent:
JULIE L JONES and FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John P. Ware et al v. Abbvie, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
John P Ware , Andrew L Waters , Toleda Waters and others
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. , Abbott Laboratories Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John P. Ware et al v. Abbvie, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:15-cv-09792
Plaintiff:
John P Ware , Andrew L Waters , Toleda Waters and others
Defendant:
Abbvie, Inc. , Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , McKesson Corporation and others
John P. Ware et al v. Abbvie, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09792
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbvie, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Abplanalp, Brian Baer, Gina Barber and others
In re: Shannon Robinson
as 15-15380
Petitioner:
In re: SHANNON DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Shannon Robinson
as 15-14789
Petitioner:
In re: SHANNON DOUGLAS ROBINSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Robinson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv08089
Plaintiff:
Malinda L. Robinson and Shannon A. Robinson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
