Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CRAWFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76017
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Weitzell et al
as 4:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Waller, Thomas Hicks, Scott Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roy Adams
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00207
Plaintiff:
Ray Mandell Stevenson
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Shawn Crawford and Administrative Law Judge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zambon v. Crawford et al (TWP1)
as 3:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
Sheila J. Zambon
Defendant:
Shawn Crawford , Todd Nallion , Nicol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haire v. Iowa Board of Parole et al
as 4:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
Michael Haire
Defendant:
Iowa Board of Parole, Cleo Hester, Steven Scholl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Crawford and Shawn Crawford
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Connor v. IDOC Board of Directors et al
as 4:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Robert J Connor
Defendant:
IDOC Board of Directors, IDOC, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. Laymon et al
as 3:2013cv00015
Defendant:
Paul Laymon, City of Sevierville, Tennessee and Shawn Crawford
Plaintiff:
John Mark Belcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Gill v. Matt R Jennings et al
as 8:2012cv02235
Defendant:
Greg Contillo, Michael Cornelius, Shawn Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
David Gill
USA v. Shawn Crawford
as 11-5544
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN CRAWFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
