Cases 41 - 50 of 204
Mitchell v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2020cv02788
Respondent:
Shelby County Jail
Petitioner:
Koviun Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ball v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2020cv02662
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail and Correct Care Solutions
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boaz Pleasant-Bey v. Shelby County, TN, et al
as 20-5908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOAZ PLEASANT-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN, CHARLES GATEWOOD, Detention Response Team Officer and ROBERT MOORE, Chief Jailer at Shelby County Jail
Turner v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv02379
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Ms. Lewis and Ms. Branch
Plaintiff:
Donald Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Shelby County Jail Administrator et al
as 2:2020cv00600
Petitioner:
Jason Lamar Jefferson
Respondent:
Shelby County Jail Administrator and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rowe v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2020cv00445
Respondent:
Shelby County Jail
Petitioner:
Catherine Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barbaro v. 42 U.S.C. 654(3) Child Support Divsion et al
as 2:2020cv02177
Defendant:
42 U.S.C. 654(3) Child Support Divsion, Debra Sanders, Sheldon Y. McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Barbaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Shelby County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 2:2020cv02110
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail and Shelby County Adult Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Christian Cordell Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Werich et al
as 3:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Moore and Julian F. Carter II
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Lee Rayborn, Billy Nicluson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00143
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Nelson, Deputy Summers and others
Plaintiff:
Antuone Decarlo Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
