Cases 11 - 20 of 107
Shelton v. Missouri Department of Corrections Staff et al
as 2:2021cv04094
Defendant:
Sydnee Serr, Brock Van Loo, Missouri Department of Corrections Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Shelton et al
as 4:2020cv01703
Defendant:
Joann Shelton doing business as Family Support Division and Child Support Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Jalil Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shelton v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01391
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Lisa Shelton
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Miller County, Missouri et al
as 2:2020cv04164
Defendant:
Jared Lane, Joe Whittle, Caleb Shelton and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Williams, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. City of Springfield, MO et al
as 6:2020cv03258
Defendant:
Councilmember Matthew Simpson, City of Springfield, MO, Councilmember Abe McGull and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2020cv00621
Defendant:
Toney Manuel, Terrance Dooley, Jr., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Rashaud Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wallace v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 5:2020cv06111
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Mark Hoyt and Phillip Shelton
Plaintiff:
Teresa Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. Phelps et al
as 2:2020cv04120
Plaintiff:
Franklin E Evans, Jr and Autumn Williams
Defendant:
Eric Phelps, Christopher Carl Shelton, Shikles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Akins
as 4:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Richard D. Akins and Andrea Bielecki
Plaintiff:
Jordan E. Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
S.H. et al v. Tidball et al
as 4:2020cv00049
Plaintiff:
Mary Hendrixson and S.H.
Defendant:
Bradley Harmon, Joy Stevens, Mockia Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
