Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Good Shepherd Corp. v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Good Shepherd Corp.
Defendant:
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Holder et al v. Bailo
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Braxton Holder and Edward L. Weaver
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas v. Becerra
as 4:2023cv04799
Plaintiff:
Baptist Hospitals of Southeast, Ascension Providence, Ascension Seton d/b/a Ascension Seton Hays and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Shepherd v. Owners Insurance
as 2:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Sarah Shepherd
Defendant:
Owners Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Henry v. Shepherd
as 9:2023cv80207
Plaintiff:
Nelson Henry
Defendant:
Caroline Cahill Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Shepherd et al v. Orcutt
as 2:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Greg Lance Shepherd and Neighborhood Plumbing Incorporated
Defendant:
Tammy Wyn Orcutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Campbell v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc
as 4:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Shepherd Campbell
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Campbell v. Academy Ltd
as 4:2022cv01005
Plaintiff:
Shepherd Campbell
Defendant:
Academy Ltd doing business as Academy Sports & Outdoors
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
