Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Shew v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv00227
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stephen Shew
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Taylor v. Shew et al
as 5:2026cv00153
Plaintiff:
Timmy Joe Taylor
Defendant:
Chris Shew and C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shew v. Zenith Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv01215
Plaintiff:
Kermit Shew
Defendant:
Zenith Construction, Inc. and Ben Shaool Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00461
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nelson v. Shew
as 3:2025cv00477
Plaintiff:
Roland Nelson
Defendant:
Larry Shew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Shew
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Brandon Neal Holland
Respondent:
Chris Shew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brady Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina
as 24-6309
Plaintiff:
BRADY LEON SPICER
Defendant:
JONATHAN CALL, Lieutenant, ROBERT CLAYTON ANDERSON, DEREK ELLIS, Parole Office and others
Pacheco v. Duncan et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Respondent:
Michael D. Duncan, Heather S. Warren, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Spiehs v. Armbrister et al
as 5:2024cv04005
Plaintiff:
Justin Spiehs
Defendant:
Jay Armbrister, Tyler Kruzel, Jimmy Wold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holland v. Shew et al
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Brandon Neal Holland
Defendant:
Chris Shew, Jason Whitley and Shelby Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
